uttapen

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 API: toman pricing and code

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

toolsreasoningjson
Input · per 1M tokens
277,145 toman
Output · per 1M tokens
554,290 toman
One 1,000-word request ≈
1,081 toman

You are billed for the usage the request actually reported. Prices follow the market. Cached input: 23,095 toman / 1M.Pricing and top-ups

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 example: tool calling

The example is picked from this model's own capabilities. Drop in your key and it runs as is.

from openai import OpenAI
import json

client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.uttapen.ir/v1", api_key="sk-up-…")

tools = [{
    "type": "function",
    "function": {
        "name": "check_stock",
        "description": "Returns the stock level of a product",
        "parameters": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {"sku": {"type": "string"}},
            "required": ["sku"],
        },
    },
}]

messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "How many of the Nike NK-42 shoe are in stock?"}]
first = client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=messages, tools=tools)
call = first.choices[0].message.tool_calls[0]

# you run the function yourself — the model never touches the database
args = json.loads(call.function.arguments)
result = {"sku": args["sku"], "qty": 7}

messages += [first.choices[0].message, {"role": "tool", "tool_call_id": call.id, "content": json.dumps(result)}]
final = client.chat.completions.create(model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", messages=messages, tools=tools)
print(final.choices[0].message.content)

What is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 good for?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 is one of DeepSeek's models. Put "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro" in the model field and the rest of your code stays as it is. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 keeps 1,048,576 tokens in view at once, and that number is what caps the conversation history in your product. A single response can run to 384,000 tokens. On price it sits in the "cheap" band — cheaper than 197 and dearer than 209 of the other paid models in the catalogue.

Capabilities available on this id: it supports tool calling, so it can invoke your own functions with valid arguments; it returns schema-valid JSON through response_format, ready to hand to your code; it has a reasoning mode that pays off on multi-step problems, maths and debugging. All of it works through the standard parameters of the official OpenAI SDK — no custom client, no wrapper. Keep in mind that reasoning tokens are output tokens and do appear on the bill.

For a back-of-envelope figure: about 1,081 toman per 1,000-word exchange (277,145 in, 554,290 out, per 1M tokens). It supports cached input: repeated context is billed at 23,095 toman per 1M, which matters a lot if your system prompt is long. You are always charged for the usage the request actually reported, never for the estimate, and a failed request costs nothing.

The closest alternative with the same capabilities from a different provider is GLM 5: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 works out roughly 1.1× more expensive, and its context window is larger. Both run on the same key and the same code, so trying the other one is a single string change.

To make the figure concrete: 100,000 toman of credit buys roughly 93 thousand-word requests on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, and every 1,000 toman is about 925 words of round trip. A job with one million input tokens and one million output tokens comes to 831,434 toman in total. Filling this model's 1,048,576-token window costs 290,607 toman on the input side alone, which is the real reason to keep conversation history short.

Its nearest relative in the catalogue is "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813", and choosing between those two is where most people hesitate. On a thousand-word request this variant works out 1.5× cheaper (1,081 against 1,583 toman). On parameters, this one takes max_completion_tokens.

DeepSeek has 17 models in our catalogue; the cheapest is DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest at 79 toman per thousand words and the dearest DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) at 1,991. Among the less common parameters it accepts logit_bias, logprobs, max_completion_tokens, min_p, reasoning_effort, repetition_penalty — all through the standard request body. By context size the nearest option from another provider is Gemini 2.5 Flash at 1,048,576 tokens.

What to use it for: high-volume work such as classification, tagging and bulk summarising, logic puzzles and code review, agents that reach out to APIs and databases, extracting data against a fixed schema, analysing a long document or codebase in one request.

Provider's own description

DeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...

Three real jobs, priced on this model

Each figure is derived from the prices above and moves when they do.

JobTokensCost
One chat turn with a medium history1,500 in + 400 out637 toman
Summarising a ten-page document4,000 in + 600 out1,441 toman
Classifying a thousand short rows120,000 in + 20,000 out44,343 toman

Price history

DateInput (toman/1M)Output (toman/1M)
2026-09-07277,145554,290
2026-09-07302,386604,771
2026-09-07300,366600,733
2026-09-06190,670381,339

Every price change for this model is recorded. Toman figures use today's rate.

Frequently asked

How do I call DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 from Iran?
Sign up with your mobile number, top the wallet up in toman, create an API key, then in the official OpenAI SDK point base_url at https://api.uttapen.ir/v1 and set model to "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro". Nothing else in your code changes.
What does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cost in toman?
277,145 toman per 1M input tokens and 554,290 toman per 1M output tokens; a 1,000-word request is around 1,081 toman. You pay for the usage that request actually reported, and a failed request costs nothing.
How much input does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 take?
Up to 1,048,576 tokens per request, roughly 786k words. A single answer can reach 384,000 tokens.
Does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 support streaming and tool calling?
Streaming (stream=true) works on every model here. This one supports tool calling in the standard OpenAI shape. Structured output through response_format works too.