uttapen

GPT-5 vs DeepSeek V3

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, DeepSeek V3 comes out about 9.3× cheaper.

FeatureGPT-5DeepSeek V3
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
Model idopenai/gpt-5deepseek/deepseek-chat
Context400,000 tokens163,840 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens362,656 toman92,840 toman
Output / 1M tokens2,901,250 toman258,211 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request4,243 toman456 toman
Input caching36,266 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

GPT-5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
4,243 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

DeepSeek V3

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
456 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openai/gpt-5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-chat"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1