uttapen

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureDeepSeek V3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
ProviderDeepSeekQwen (Alibaba)
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-chatqwen/qwen3-coder
Context163,840 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens
Input / 1M tokens92,840 toman87,038 toman
Output / 1M tokens258,211 toman290,125 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request456 toman490 toman
Input cachingNo29,013 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

DeepSeek V3

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
456 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
490 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-chat",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-coder"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1