uttapen

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro comes out about 1.6× cheaper.

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Model idanthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5google/gemini-2.5-pro
Context1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output64,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Input / 1M tokens870,375 toman362,656 toman
Output / 1M tokens4,351,875 toman2,901,250 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request6,789 toman4,243 toman
Input caching87,038 toman / 1M36,266 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Claude Sonnet 4.5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
6,789 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Gemini 2.5 Pro

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
4,243 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "google/gemini-2.5-pro"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1