uttapen

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5 Mini

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GPT-5 Mini comes out about 2.7× cheaper.

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5 Mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Model idanthropic/claude-haiku-4.5openai/gpt-5-mini
Context200,000 tokens400,000 tokens
Max output64,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens290,125 toman72,531 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,450,625 toman580,250 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request2,263 toman849 toman
Input caching29,013 toman / 1M7,253 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Claude Haiku 4.5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
2,263 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-5 Mini

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
849 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-5-mini"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1