uttapen

Hunyuan A13B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Hunyuan A13B Instruct comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureHunyuan A13B InstructMistral Small 3.1 24B
ProviderTencentMistral
Model idtencent/hunyuan-a13b-instructmistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct
Context131,072 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output117,964 tokens102,400 tokens
Input / 1M tokens40,618 toman101,834 toman
Output / 1M tokens165,371 toman161,019 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request268 toman342 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Hunyuan A13B Instruct

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
268 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
342 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "tencent/hunyuan-a13b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "mistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1