uttapen

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3.6 35B A3B comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3.6 35B A3BQwen3 Coder Flash
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3bqwen/qwen3-coder-flash
Context262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output235,929 tokens65,536 tokens
Input / 1M tokens29,013 toman56,574 toman
Output / 1M tokens261,113 toman282,872 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request377 toman441 toman
Input caching14,506 toman / 1M11,315 toman / 1M
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
377 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 Coder Flash

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
441 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-coder-flash"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1