uttapen

Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
ProviderMetaMeta
Model idmeta-llama/llama-4-scoutmeta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct
Context1,310,720 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens29,013 toman29,013 toman
Output / 1M tokens87,038 toman92,840 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request151 toman158 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Llama 4 Scout

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
151 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
158 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "meta-llama/llama-4-scout",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1