uttapen

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813:batchdeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Context1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output943,718 tokens384,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens382,965 toman304,457 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,148,895 toman913,372 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,991 toman1,583 toman
Input caching37,716 toman / 1M10,149 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,991 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,583 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813:batch",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1