uttapen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, DeepSeek V3.1 comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro
Context163,840 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output144,900 tokens384,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens159,569 toman277,145 toman
Output / 1M tokens478,706 toman554,290 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request830 toman1,081 toman
Input caching159,569 toman / 1M23,095 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

DeepSeek V3.1

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
830 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,081 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1