uttapen

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureGLM 5.3 Flash (batch)Qwen3 30B A3B
ProviderZ.ai (GLM)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idz-ai/glm-5.3-flash:batchqwen/qwen3-30b-a3b
Context1,048,575 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output943,717 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens43,519 toman34,815 toman
Output / 1M tokens145,063 toman145,063 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request245 toman234 toman
Input caching8,704 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
245 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 30B A3B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
234 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "z-ai/glm-5.3-flash:batch",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1