uttapen

GLM 4.5 Air vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GLM 4.5 Air comes out about 1.7× cheaper.

FeatureGLM 4.5 AirLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
ProviderZ.ai (GLM)Sao10k
Model idz-ai/glm-4.5-airsao10k/l3.1-euryale-70b
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output98,304 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens37,716 toman246,606 toman
Output / 1M tokens246,606 toman246,606 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request370 toman641 toman
Input caching7,253 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

GLM 4.5 Air

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
370 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
641 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "z-ai/glm-4.5-air",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "sao10k/l3.1-euryale-70b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1