uttapen

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureMiMo-V2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderXiaomiDeepSeek
Model idxiaomi/mimo-v2.5deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Context1,050,000 tokens1,310,720 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Input / 1M tokens40,618 toman40,618 toman
Output / 1M tokens81,235 toman81,235 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request158 toman158 toman
Input caching812 toman / 1M8,124 toman / 1M
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

MiMo-V2.5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
158 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
158 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "xiaomi/mimo-v2.5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1