uttapen

Grok Build 0.1 vs Seed 1.6

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Seed 1.6 comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureGrok Build 0.1Seed 1.6
ProviderxAIByteDance Seed
Model idx-ai/grok-build-0.1bytedance-seed/seed-1.6
Context256,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output230,400 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens290,125 toman72,531 toman
Output / 1M tokens580,250 toman580,250 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,131 toman849 toman
Input caching58,025 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Grok Build 0.1

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,131 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Seed 1.6

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
849 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "x-ai/grok-build-0.1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "bytedance-seed/seed-1.6"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1