uttapen

Cydonia 24B V4.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 30B A3B comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureCydonia 24B V4.1Qwen3 30B A3B
ProviderThedrummerQwen (Alibaba)
Model idthedrummer/cydonia-24b-v4.1qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output117,964 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens87,038 toman34,815 toman
Output / 1M tokens145,063 toman145,063 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request302 toman234 toman
Input caching43,519 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

Cydonia 24B V4.1

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
302 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 30B A3B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
234 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "thedrummer/cydonia-24b-v4.1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1