uttapen

Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureStep 3.7 FlashQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderStepFunQwen (Alibaba)
Model idstepfun/step-3.7-flashqwen/qwen3.6-flash
Context262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output230,400 tokens65,536 tokens
Input / 1M tokens58,025 toman54,398 toman
Output / 1M tokens333,644 toman326,391 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request509 toman495 toman
Input caching11,605 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Step 3.7 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
509 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3.6 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
495 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "stepfun/step-3.7-flash",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3.6-flash"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1