uttapen

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GLM 4.5 Air

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GLM 4.5 Air comes out about 1.7× cheaper.

FeatureLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2GLM 4.5 Air
ProviderSao10kZ.ai (GLM)
Model idsao10k/l3.1-euryale-70bz-ai/glm-4.5-air
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens98,304 tokens
Input / 1M tokens246,606 toman37,716 toman
Output / 1M tokens246,606 toman246,606 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request641 toman370 toman
Input cachingNo7,253 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
641 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GLM 4.5 Air

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
370 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "sao10k/l3.1-euryale-70b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "z-ai/glm-4.5-air"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1