uttapen

Sakana Namazu vs Kimi K2.6

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureSakana NamazuKimi K2.6
ProviderSakanaMoonshot (Kimi)
Model idsakana/sakana-namazumoonshotai/kimi-k2.6
Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens235,929 tokens
Input / 1M tokens275,619 toman275,619 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,160,500 toman1,160,500 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,867 toman1,867 toman
Input caching43,519 toman / 1M46,420 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Sakana Namazu

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,867 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Kimi K2.6

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,867 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "sakana/sakana-namazu",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "moonshotai/kimi-k2.6"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1