uttapen

Relace Apply 3 vs Claude 3 Haiku

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Claude 3 Haiku comes out about 1.4× cheaper.

FeatureRelace Apply 3Claude 3 Haiku
ProviderRelaceAnthropic
Model idrelace/relace-apply-3anthropic/claude-3-haiku
Context256,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Input / 1M tokens246,606 toman72,531 toman
Output / 1M tokens362,656 toman362,656 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request792 toman566 toman
Input cachingNo8,704 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputNoNo
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Relace Apply 3

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
792 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Claude 3 Haiku

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
566 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "relace/relace-apply-3",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "anthropic/claude-3-haiku"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1