uttapen

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct comes out about 1.5× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3 VL 32B InstructQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3-vl-32b-instructqwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct
Context131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens30,173 toman104,445 toman
Output / 1M tokens120,692 toman116,050 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request196 toman287 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
196 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
287 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3-vl-32b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1