uttapen

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3-coderqwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct
Context262,144 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens29,491 tokens
Input / 1M tokens87,038 toman191,483 toman
Output / 1M tokens290,125 toman290,125 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request490 toman626 toman
Input caching29,013 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
490 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

  • Chat, summarising, and everyday text generation
626 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3-coder",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1