uttapen

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3.7 MaxQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3.7-maxqwen/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-thinking
Context1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens427,934 toman116,050 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,283,803 toman1,160,500 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request2,225 toman1,660 toman
Input caching85,587 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Qwen3.7 Max

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
2,225 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,660 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3.7-max",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-thinking"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1