uttapen

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureQwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3.6-flashqwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct
Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens235,929 tokens
Input / 1M tokens54,398 toman29,013 toman
Output / 1M tokens326,391 toman319,138 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request495 toman453 toman
Input cachingNo20,309 toman / 1M
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Qwen3.6 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
495 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
453 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3.6-flash",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1