uttapen

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B (batch)

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3.5-Flash comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5-9B (batch)
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23qwen/qwen3.5-9b:batch
Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens235,929 tokens
Input / 1M tokens18,858 toman49,321 toman
Output / 1M tokens75,433 toman72,531 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request123 toman158 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Qwen3.5-Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
123 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3.5-9B (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
158 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3.5-9b:batch"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1