uttapen

Qwen3.5-9B (batch) vs Qwen3 14B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 14B comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureQwen3.5-9B (batch)Qwen3 14B
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen3.5-9b:batchqwen/qwen3-14b
Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output235,929 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens49,321 toman34,815 toman
Output / 1M tokens72,531 toman69,630 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request158 toman136 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Qwen3.5-9B (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
158 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 14B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
136 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen3.5-9b:batch",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-14b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1