uttapen

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instructqwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct
Context128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output115,200 tokens29,491 tokens
Input / 1M tokens232,100 toman191,483 toman
Output / 1M tokens290,125 toman290,125 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request679 toman626 toman
Input caching116,050 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
679 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

  • Chat, summarising, and everyday text generation
626 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1