uttapen

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instructqwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct
Context32,768 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output29,491 tokens115,200 tokens
Input / 1M tokens191,483 toman232,100 toman
Output / 1M tokens290,125 toman290,125 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request626 toman679 toman
Input cachingNo116,050 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoNo
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

  • Chat, summarising, and everyday text generation
626 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
679 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1