uttapen

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureQwen2.5 7B InstructQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen-2.5-7b-instructqwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507
Context32,768 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output29,491 tokens32,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens29,013 toman13,970 toman
Output / 1M tokens58,025 toman56,009 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request113 toman91 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
113 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
91 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen-2.5-7b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1