uttapen

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct comes out about 1.5× cheaper.

FeatureQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 VL 32B Instruct
ProviderQwen (Alibaba)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idqwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instructqwen/qwen3-vl-32b-instruct
Context32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens104,445 toman30,173 toman
Output / 1M tokens116,050 toman120,692 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request287 toman196 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
287 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
196 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-vl-32b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1