uttapen

Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureLaguna S 2.1Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
ProviderPoolsideinclusionAI
Model idpoolside/laguna-s-2.1inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin
Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens235,929 tokens
Input / 1M tokens26,111 toman17,408 toman
Output / 1M tokens52,223 toman52,223 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request102 toman91 toman
Input caching2,611 toman / 1M3,482 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Laguna S 2.1

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
102 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
91 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "poolside/laguna-s-2.1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1