uttapen

Pareto Code Router vs o1-pro

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeaturePareto Code Routero1-pro
ProviderOpenRouterOpenAI
Model idopenrouter/pareto-codeopenai/o1-pro
Context2,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output100,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens43,518,750 toman
Output / 1M tokens174,075,000 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request282,872 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

Pareto Code Router

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
per 1,000 words · Model page

o1-pro

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
282,872 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openrouter/pareto-code",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/o1-pro"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1