uttapen

gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

Featuregpt-oss-20bQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIQwen (Alibaba)
Model idopenai/gpt-oss-20bqwen/qwen3.7-flash
Context131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output117,964 tokens65,536 tokens
Input / 1M tokens8,704 toman8,704 toman
Output / 1M tokens37,716 toman37,716 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request60 toman60 toman
Input caching8,704 toman / 1M1,741 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

gpt-oss-20b

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
60 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3.7 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
60 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openai/gpt-oss-20b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3.7-flash"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1