uttapen

GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) vs GPT-4o-mini

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureGPT-5.4 Nano (batch)GPT-4o-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Model idopenai/gpt-5.4-nano:batchopenai/gpt-4o-mini
Context400,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens29,013 toman43,519 toman
Output / 1M tokens181,328 toman174,075 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request273 toman283 toman
Input caching2,901 toman / 1M21,759 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
273 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-4o-mini

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
283 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openai/gpt-5.4-nano:batch",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-4o-mini"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1