uttapen

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-4.1 (batch)

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GPT-4.1 (batch) comes out about 1.4× cheaper.

FeatureGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kGPT-4.1 (batch)
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Model idopenai/gpt-3.5-turbo-16kopenai/gpt-4.1:batch
Context16,385 tokens1,047,576 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens870,375 toman290,125 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,160,500 toman1,160,500 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request2,640 toman1,886 toman
Input cachingNo72,531 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
2,640 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-4.1 (batch)

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,886 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-16k",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-4.1:batch"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1