uttapen

Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureKimi K2 0711Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
ProviderMoonshot (Kimi)Qwen (Alibaba)
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output100,352 tokens117,964 tokens
Input / 1M tokens165,371 toman66,729 toman
Output / 1M tokens667,288 toman667,288 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,082 toman954 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

Kimi K2 0711

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,082 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
954 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k2",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1