uttapen

Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Kimi K2.6 comes out about 1.4× cheaper.

FeatureKimi K2.6GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
ProviderMoonshot (Kimi)OpenAI
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-16k
Context262,144 tokens16,385 tokens
Max output235,929 tokens4,096 tokens
Input / 1M tokens275,619 toman870,375 toman
Output / 1M tokens1,160,500 toman1,160,500 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,867 toman2,640 toman
Input caching46,420 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Kimi K2.6

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,867 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
2,640 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-16k"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1