uttapen

Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-5.4 Mini (batch)

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureKimi K2.5GPT-5.4 Mini (batch)
ProviderMoonshot (Kimi)OpenAI
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5openai/gpt-5.4-mini:batch
Context262,144 tokens400,000 tokens
Max output235,929 tokens128,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens130,556 toman108,797 toman
Output / 1M tokens652,781 toman652,781 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,018 toman990 toman
Input caching20,309 toman / 1M10,880 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Kimi K2.5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,018 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-5.4 Mini (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
990 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "moonshotai/kimi-k2.5",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-5.4-mini:batch"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1