uttapen

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Mistral Small 3.2 24B comes out about 1.5× cheaper.

FeatureMistral Small 3.2 24BMinistral 3 14B 2512
ProviderMistralMistral
Model idmistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instructmistralai/ministral-14b-2512
Context131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens209,715 tokens
Input / 1M tokens21,759 toman58,025 toman
Output / 1M tokens58,025 toman58,025 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request104 toman151 toman
Input cachingNo5,803 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
104 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Ministral 3 14B 2512

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
151 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "mistralai/ministral-14b-2512"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1