uttapen

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Saba

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureMistral Small 3.1 24BSaba
ProviderMistralMistral
Model idmistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instructmistralai/mistral-saba
Context128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output102,400 tokens26,214 tokens
Input / 1M tokens101,834 toman58,025 toman
Output / 1M tokens161,019 toman174,075 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request342 toman302 toman
Input cachingNo5,803 toman / 1M
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
342 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Saba

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
302 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "mistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "mistralai/mistral-saba"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1