uttapen

Mistral Small 4 vs Saba

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureMistral Small 4Saba
ProviderMistralMistral
Model idmistralai/mistral-small-2603mistralai/mistral-saba
Context262,144 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output209,715 tokens26,214 tokens
Input / 1M tokens43,519 toman58,025 toman
Output / 1M tokens174,075 toman174,075 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request283 toman302 toman
Input caching4,352 toman / 1M5,803 toman / 1M
Image inputYesNo
File inputNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Mistral Small 4

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
283 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Saba

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
302 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "mistralai/mistral-small-2603",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "mistralai/mistral-saba"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1