uttapen

Mistral Nemo vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Mistral Nemo comes out about 1.9× cheaper.

FeatureMistral NemoLlama 3 8B Lunaris
ProviderMistralSao10k
Model idmistralai/mistral-nemosao10k/l3-lunaris-8b
Context131,072 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens7,372 tokens
Input / 1M tokens5,512 toman11,605 toman
Output / 1M tokens8,704 toman14,506 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request18 toman34 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Mistral Nemo

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
18 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
34 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "mistralai/mistral-nemo",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "sao10k/l3-lunaris-8b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1