uttapen

MiniMax M1 vs MiniMax M2-her

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, MiniMax M2-her comes out about 1.8× cheaper.

FeatureMiniMax M1MiniMax M2-her
ProviderMiniMaxMiniMax
Model idminimax/minimax-m1minimax/minimax-m2-her
Context1,000,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Max output40,000 tokens2,048 tokens
Input / 1M tokens159,569 toman87,038 toman
Output / 1M tokens638,275 toman348,150 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,037 toman566 toman
Input cachingNo8,704 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputNoNo
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

MiniMax M1

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,037 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

MiniMax M2-her

  • Chat, summarising, and everyday text generation
566 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "minimax/minimax-m1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "minimax/minimax-m2-her"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1