uttapen

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) comes out about 1.7× cheaper.

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BGPT-5.4 Nano (batch)
ProviderMicrosoftOpenAI
Model idmicrosoft/wizardlm-2-8x22bopenai/gpt-5.4-nano:batch
Context65,535 tokens400,000 tokens
Max output8,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens179,878 toman29,013 toman
Output / 1M tokens179,878 toman181,328 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request468 toman273 toman
Input cachingNo2,901 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

WizardLM-2 8x22B

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
468 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
273 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "microsoft/wizardlm-2-8x22b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-5.4-nano:batch"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1