uttapen

Phi 4 vs Nova Micro 1.0

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Nova Micro 1.0 comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeaturePhi 4Nova Micro 1.0
ProviderMicrosoftAmazon
Model idmicrosoft/phi-4amazon/nova-micro-v1
Context16,384 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output14,745 tokens5,120 tokens
Input / 1M tokens20,309 toman10,154 toman
Output / 1M tokens40,618 toman40,618 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request79 toman66 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Phi 4

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
79 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Nova Micro 1.0

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
66 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "microsoft/phi-4",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "amazon/nova-micro-v1"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1