uttapen

Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiniMax-01

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureMuse Glimmer 30BMiniMax-01
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Model idmeta/muse-glimmer-30bminimax/minimax-01
Context131,072 tokens1,000,192 tokens
Max output117,964 tokens900,172 tokens
Input / 1M tokens87,038 toman58,025 toman
Output / 1M tokens319,138 toman319,138 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request528 toman490 toman
Input caching11,605 toman / 1MNo
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Muse Glimmer 30B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
528 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

MiniMax-01

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
490 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "meta/muse-glimmer-30b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "minimax/minimax-01"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1