uttapen

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comes out about 2.1× cheaper.

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
ProviderMetaMeta
Model idmeta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instructmeta-llama/llama-3.2-3b-instruct
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens117,964 tokens
Input / 1M tokens116,050 toman14,506 toman
Output / 1M tokens116,050 toman95,741 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request302 toman143 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoNo

Which one for what?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
302 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
143 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "meta-llama/llama-3.2-3b-instruct"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1