uttapen

MythoMax 13B vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Ling 3.0 Flash comes out about 1.4× cheaper.

FeatureMythoMax 13BLing 3.0 Flash
ProviderGrypheinclusionAI
Model idgryphe/mythomax-l2-13binclusionai/ling-3.0-flash
Context8,192 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output3,686 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens17,408 toman6,093 toman
Output / 1M tokens17,408 toman18,278 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request45 toman32 toman
Input cachingNo1,219 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

MythoMax 13B

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
45 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Ling 3.0 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
32 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1