uttapen

Gemma 3 27B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureGemma 3 27BGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Model idgoogle/gemma-3-27b-itgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Context131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output117,964 tokens65,535 tokens
Input / 1M tokens23,210 toman29,013 toman
Output / 1M tokens130,556 toman116,050 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request200 toman189 toman
Input caching11,605 toman / 1M2,901 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

Gemma 3 27B

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
200 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
189 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "google/gemma-3-27b-it",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1