uttapen

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 3 27B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemma 3 27B
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Model idgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash-litegoogle/gemma-3-27b-it
Context1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output65,535 tokens117,964 tokens
Input / 1M tokens29,013 toman23,210 toman
Output / 1M tokens116,050 toman130,556 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request189 toman200 toman
Input caching2,901 toman / 1M11,605 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
189 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Gemma 3 27B

  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
200 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "google/gemma-3-27b-it"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1