uttapen

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Hy-MT2-1.8B comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Hy-MT2-1.8B
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-flashtencent/hy-mt2-1.8b
Context1,048,576 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output384,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Input / 1M tokens25,707 toman12,766 toman
Output / 1M tokens51,414 toman51,352 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request100 toman83 toman
Input caching5,141 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
100 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Hy-MT2-1.8B

  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
83 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "tencent/hy-mt2-1.8b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1